로그인|회원가입|고객센터|HBR Korea
Top
온라인카지노 조작 벳무브
검색버튼 메뉴버튼

온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 or Cash? The Signal Sent by the Way You Pay

온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 | 1호 (2008년 1월)
It’s well known that the stock market reacts more favorably if a company is bought with cash than with stock. But the opposite holds true when you buy just a business unit: It’s better to pay with your 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 rather than cash. Why? In simple terms, because the choice between cash and 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 reveals private information that the market uses to gauge value.
In collaboration with our colleagues Stefano Lovo and Myron B. Slovin, we examined how share prices respond to announcements of intercorporate asset sales and analyzed the effects of the means of payment. We found that when the buyer paid with 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브, both companies’ share prices increased; in cash deals, the seller’s value increased modestly while the buyer’s fell slightly. By contrast, numerous studies show, when entire companies are bought, the seller’s shareholders are richly rewarded in both cash and 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 deals while the buyer’s shares rise modestly in cash deals but fall in 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 deals.
As a general rule, buyers prefer to pay with 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 when they think their shares are overvalued. And sellers prefer to receive 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 when they’re confident that the asset in question will create value for the buyer, since the seller will have a stake in the buyer after the sale. Thus, a buyer’s offer to pay with 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 sends a negative signal about the buyer, but a seller’s acceptance of 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 signals the seller’s positive private information about the asset.
In practice, asymmetric information pervades all acquis온라인카지노 조작 벳무브ions and is held by both sides. Sellers have private information about the value of what they are selling, while buyers know more about what potential synergies the assets may have as part of their operations.
The difference between buying an asset and buying an entire company lies in the identity of the party whose private information governs the cash-온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 choice. In a merger, a buyer must make a formal offer that requires shareholders to vote. Hence it is the buyer that decides whether to offer cash or 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브, and the means of payment reveals the buyer’s private information. Buying assets does not involve shareholders; the seller conducts competitive auctions, which does induce potential buyers to reveal information through their bids. But by accepting, or even soliciting, payment in buyer 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브, it is the seller that conveys any positive private information it has about the quality of the deal (and vice versa when insisting on a cash deal).
Our findings have implications for other types of corporate transactions. For example, in earn-outs and in joint ventures, which often are effectively delayed-asset sales, the seller retains an interest in the cash flow that the buyer generates after the asset is added to its existing operations. In general, when a seller retains such an 온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 interest, studies show, the transaction tends to generate positive share price reactions; our research explains why.

15,000개의 아티클을 제대로 즐기는 방법

가입하면, 한 달 무료!

걱정마세요. 언제든 해지 가능합니다.

인기기사

질문, 답변, 연관 아티클 확인까지 한번에! 경제·온라인카지노 조작 벳무브 관련 질문은 AskBiz에게 물어보세요. 오늘은 무엇을 도와드릴까요?

Click!