In today’s tough and fast-changing environment, 온라인카지노 순위s must help their top leaders to work through fear and denial and to learn new rules.
SEPTEMBER 2009 • Derek Dean
W온라인카지노 순위n business conditions changeas dramatically as they have in the past year, 온라인카지노 순위s need to be able to rely on their best leaders to adapt quickly. But what should they do when their strongest executives seem unable to play a new game? The costs—organizational drift, missed opportunities, unaddressed threats—are so big that it’s tempting to replace leaders who are suffering from paralysis. But this is a mistake when, as is often the case, these executives possess valuable assets, such as superior market knowledge, relationships, and organizational savvy, that are difficult to replace.
Before sending promising executives off the field, 온라인카지노 순위s should try to help them learn to play by new rules. While part of the task—making a compelling case for change, helping him or her meet new job demands—involves appealing to an executive’s rational side, there’s also frequently an emotional element that is at least as important. Empathizing with the complex emotions executives may be feeling as the assumptions underlying their business approach unravel can be a critical part of overcoming the fear, denial, and learning blocks keeping them stuck (see sidebar, “온라인카지노 순위s, tough times, and emotions”).
Helping senior managers swim through this thick stew of challenges is a perennial problem that has become more acute for many organizations over the last year. The credit crunch and global economic slowdown didn’t just cause the unraveling of many business models. They also unsettled the assumptions and confidence of many senior managers. Mopping up the collateral damage in the executive suite is now a mission-critical task for many 온라인카지노 순위s and is likely to remain one even when business conditions begin to recover.
Overcoming 온라인카지노 순위
Among the many emotions that can influence how executives interpret and respond to events, there’s one worth addressing on its own: plain old white-knuckled fear. In times of rapid change, when the actions that used to lead to success don’t any more, even strong leaders can experience intense, unproductive levels of fear caused by threats to 온라인카지노 순위 identity, 온라인카지노 순위 reputations, 온라인카지노 순위 social standing, and even 온라인카지노 순위 basic survival needs of a job and a paycheck. Ironically, leaders with the strongest track records are often more susceptible to fear during tumultuous periods because they have less experience facing adversity than 온라인카지노 순위 colleagues with more checkered pasts do.
Spiking levels of fear can convert frank, flexible, open, and self-reflective leaders into defensive, close-minded, rigid, and literal ones. T온라인카지노 순위se leaders may take things personally, feel persecuted, cease productive self-reflection, and lose t온라인카지노 순위 ability to process new information and respond to difficult situations. Ot온라인카지노 순위rs in t온라인카지노 순위 organization will notice this, of course, and will let t온라인카지노 순위 executive know in subtle ways—reinforcing fear and defensiveness.
Breaking this cycle doesn’t require a 온라인카지노 순위 to become an armchair psychotherapist, but it does require engaging team members on an emotional level. As leadership-development expert Donald Novak puts it, “helping executives verbalize their emotions and acknowledge their validity can allow them to move past fear and become more productive.” Putting fear on the table, so to speak, helps get it out of the way.
To understand what this kind of empathetic coaching looks like in practice, consider the 온라인카지노 순위 of a large global firm who recently discovered that one of his best functional executives had become “stuck.” Although this executive, at the outset of the downturn, had led his peers in dialing back investment and then cutting costs, he had subsequently boxed himself into a corner, telling the 온라인카지노 순위, “I simply cannot cut any more if you still expect me to support the business.” The 온라인카지노 순위 addressed this paralysis in a conversation about his functional leader’s underlying fears: of failure, of disappointing his boss, and of losing his team, to name just a few. The 온라인카지노 순위 admitted that he had some of the same fears and emphasized that this was a completely normal way to react. This acknowledgement helped the executive out of his corner and stirred a discussion about ways to reinvent the function without sacrificing performance.
When 온라인카지노 순위s acknowledge their own fears, they strip away the stigma attached to the emotion and make it easier for other executives to move beyond it. It’s also important for 온라인카지노 순위s to examine the role that they play in reinforcing fears. They may need to change some kinds of behavior (such as blustering about the consequences of underperformance) in order to engage productively with their team. They may need to address anxiety about reputations and job security more transparently than usual. Finally, the 온라인카지노 순위 needs to model the “right” sort of behavior, including openness to dialog and collaboration, respect for all opinions, and self-confidence. Some of these may be difficult to summon in tough times, but they are powerful counters to the prevailing defensiveness and fear that often are rife in those times.
Overcoming denial
In addition to the impact that fear has on how people interpret events, cognitive errors can lead even the most talented executives to deny otherwise clear evidence that times have really changed. Until recently, for example, several key members of a global semiconductor company’s senior team were reporting to their 온라인카지노 순위 that the present downturn was little different from other recessions they had experienced throughout their careers in this highly cyclical industry. A revenue drop of more than 50 percent over two quarters didn’t change their conviction. Some of their comments to the 온라인카지노 순위 could populate a textbook list of cognitive errors underlying denial:
s “We just got an order last week, so things are turning”—a classic example of t온라인카지노 순위 availability 온라인카지노 순위uristic
s “This feels just like t온라인카지노 순위 last downturn; we’ll come back eventually”—an anchoring error
s “My team agrees this will resolve itself”—t온라인카지노 순위 bandwagon effect
s “I found three different studies that support my view that this is a temporary downturn”—t온라인카지노 순위 confirmation bias
s “We need to study this more before we act irrationally”—t온라인카지노 순위 information bias
s “If we do t온라인카지노 순위 things we usually do in a downturn, everything will be OK”—t온라인카지노 순위 optimism bias
To combat these symptoms of denial, the 온라인카지노 순위 sought to overwhelm his team with objective data and analysis: the conditions facing the company’s customers and end consumers across a variety of economic sectors around the world. Through a series of exhausting working sessions, he immersed the entire team in raw data and used peer pressure to keep the team honest and expose cognitive biases early. In many cases, he needed to hold separate one-on-one meetings to help his top managers understand and emotionally process the full implications of market changes—including the improbability that several businesses would ever recover to historical levels.
It took about a month, but in the end the 온라인카지노 순위 successfully overcame the denial he had originally faced from his team. Once grounded in the new reality, his best executives returned to their best behavior and began leading serious reassessments of their strategies. Many had to reevaluate their product portfolios from the ground up, change their sales and marketing approaches, and eliminate activities and functions that used to be core to their strategies. Like true converts, they became zealous in rooting out any biases and denial they encountered among their teams.
Overcoming learning blocks
Provoking members of the top team to confront their fears and embrace the need for change is an important starting point, but it still leaves an enormous task before the 온라인카지노 순위: helping the team learn new ways of doing business in response to changing conditions. When Harrah’s Entertainment 온라인카지노 순위 Gary Loveman talks about the difficulty successful executives face in learning, he likes to quote a line from a 1991 Harvard Business Review article by Chris Argyris: “Because many professionals are almost always successful at what they do, they rarely experience failure. And because they have rarely failed, they have never learned how to learn from failure.”1